Abstract Numerous US specialists bring up an individuals future improvement of coronary illness utilizing a gamble assessor which depends on the perceptions from a drawn out study led in Framingham. This is alluded to as the Framingham risk or the Framingham risk score. The Framingham risk assessor is utilized to compute the gamble for people who have not previously had a cardiovascular failure or any coronary illness. There are two Framingham Risk Scores, one for men and one for ladies. This chance score is the gamble of having a cardiovascular failure or passing on from coronary illness inside the time span of 10 years. By concentrating on this Framingham Risk Score (FRS) we have seen here that there is a constraint. We are attempting to eliminate this limit by utilizing the Fuzzy Logic and furthermore need give the FRS another model. In this standardized manner we are attempting to direct the Framingham Risk Score and furthermore need to build the down to earth physibility of FRS. That is the reason we are utilizing the calculation or ongoing subtleties of 10 years Cardiovascular Risk which is assessed by FRS. By making the enrollment elements of various boundaries related with the FRS framework we get more reasonable physibility in this issue space. Key Words- Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Fuzzy Logic, Cardiovascular Risk.